Composite vs Porcelain Veneers

Although composite veneers do have their advantages, there are a couple of areas in which they cannot compete with porcelain. Porcelain is a far stronger material than composite resin (even with the improvements in resin materials over the years). Well-maintained porcelain veneers can last up to 15 years or even longer compared to the 5-7 year average lifespan of composites. It’s important to consider this tradeoff if you’re thinking of having veneers placed. That is, while composites may cost less than porcelain, they do not last near as long. As such, porcelain is regarded as the better value option over time.

Porcelain veneers offer the most natural, tooth-like aesthetics. Porcelain has a translucent quality that is quite similar to natural tooth enamel. Unlike composites, porcelain is also highly resistant to staining and chipping due to the strength of the material and the glaze that is applied after treatment. Composite veneers are more porous and therefore susceptible to staining, meaning that you may need to adjust your diet in order to avoid certain stain-causing foods. Composite also needs to be polished in order to achieve a tooth-like aesthetic. And even then it doesn’t quite compare to the natural look of porcelain.

The porcelain veneer procedure is made in a lab so temporaries must be worn while you wait for the veneers to be sculpted in a lab. Porcelain veneers offer a viable treatment solution for all cases of worn enamel, wear and tear, genetic defects, uneven teeth and other, similar issues. Composites may not be a viable option for some of these conditions. For example, significant discoloration or spacing issues may not be adequately treatable with composite veneers, making porcelain your only option. Your dentist will conduct a thorough oral health evaluation as part of your consultation to determine your options.